Production Pipeline HQ

Commercial video studio  /  period ending 10 Jul

Where every project stands

Live counts across the pipeline, refreshed from the daily check-in rather than a weekly manual review. The founder's own bottleneck — status living in his head — is what this replaced.

ActiveAll open engagements
14
In editingAssigned, in progress
9
Awaiting founderNeeds review or reply
3
StalledNo movement 5+ days
1flagged, being chased

Deliverables moved to client review, last five weeks

4
6
5
9
13
Wk 1Wk 2Wk 3Wk 4Wk 5

Active pipeline by engagement type

Prime (direct client)57%
Subcontract29%
New business, scoping14%

How a deliverable actually moves

The review-round logic every project follows, documented once and reused on every asset instead of re-explained per project.

01

Internal review

Editor uploads a cut. Reviewed in-house only, the client never sees this round.

02

Promoted to WIP1

Approved internally, renamed, sent to the client with a stated feedback window.

03

Client review

Feedback logged against a due date. Silence past that date triggers a nudge, not a guess.

04

Revise → WIP2

New cut stacks as a version on the same link. Nothing re-sent from scratch.

05

Approved & delivered

Downloads enabled only at final. Status flips automatically, no manual report needed.

Deliverables tracker

Every asset tied to its project, round, and due date, so no one has to hold pipeline status in memory.

DeliverableProjectRoundEditorStatusFeedback by
Brand hero cutNorthline OutdoorWIP2R. AlvarezClient reviewJul 17
Founder interview editCedar & FinchFinalJ. OkaforApproved—
Product launch teaserHighwater SupplyIR1J. OkaforIn progressJul 21
Testimonial shortMeridian WellnessWIP1R. AlvarezNo response 6dJul 15
Recap reel :30Northline OutdoorWIP1J. OkaforClient reviewJul 24

Illustrative mockup. Structure reflects the system as built for a commercial video production studio; all client, project, and editor names are invented for portfolio use.